About Parametrica

Georgios (Yorgos) Deskos

Founder

Yorgos holds a PhD in Earth Science and Engineering from Imperial College London, where he specialized in computational fluid dynamics and wind energy. Following his doctoral work, he spent six years at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in Boulder, Colorado, working at the forefront of wind energy research and tool development.

At NREL, Yorgos developed analytical frameworks for assessing how severe weather events, particularly tropical cyclones, affect renewable energy infrastructure. His work combined high-fidelity numerical simulation with large-scale data analytics, producing results that directly informed design standards and bankable engineering assessments.

Today, Yorgos brings that same rigour to commercial projects. He is an active member of the IEC 61400-3-1 TC88 working group, the international committee that defines design requirements for offshore wind turbines, and has hands-on experience across the full Parametrica chain, from mesoscale weather modelling through aeroelastic simulation to plant-scale wake analysis.

He has authored over 40 peer-reviewed publications, directed over $6.7M of research at NREL including a $3.9M US Department of Energy programme on hurricane impacts on offshore wind, and led renewable-energy and offshore risk model product lines at Moody's used by organisations worldwide. Parametrica speaks both languages: the physics that generates a number, and the design, operating and financing decisions that number has to survive. From 1 July 2026, Parametrica operates full-time under its founding principal.

Parametrica is a Greek SME registered on the EU Funding and Tenders Portal (PIC 862445819) and is a member of the NVIDIA Inception programme. Compute runs on a mix of local hardware and cloud burst. Where the work needs capability we do not have in house, we bring in named collaborators from the research network rather than pretending the company is larger than it is.

                            IEC TC88
                            Standards committee member, IEC 61400-3-1 offshore wind design
                        

                            6 Years
                            National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
                        

                            PhD
                            Imperial College London, Earth Science & Engineering
                        

                            40+
                            Peer-reviewed publications; $6.7M of directed R&D
                        

Our Approach

We are a research company that sells engineering work, and the order matters. A number survives challenge when it can be traced back to the physics that produced it, tested across the uncertainty around it, and documented well enough that someone else can re-run it. That is research discipline applied to a commercial deadline, and it is the whole method.

Every analysis we produce, whether design loads, a wake study, a reliability or lifetime assessment, a calibrated forecast or a certification submission, is built to withstand scrutiny from owners, lenders, independent engineers, grid operators and certification bodies. We use open-source, auditable, national-laboratory codebases because transparency is not optional when millions are on the line, and because the same physics has to hold from a turbine on a drawing board to a fleet twenty years into its life.

Reliability and lifetime are engineering questions for us, not statistical ones. The same aeroelastic models that defend a turbine in front of a certifier should describe what that turbine actually does, component by component, over twenty years in the field. We resolve those questions asset by asset, from first principles, rather than fitting historical loss data to a portfolio.

Same physics, both ends of an asset's life

Design and lifetime aren't separate problems. The aeroelastic model that defends a turbine at certification should describe what it actually does over twenty years in the field.

Transparent, auditable, defensible

Open-source tools, documented methods, results a third party can re-run. Transparency is not optional when millions are on the line.

Research first, product second

We publish, we sit on the IEC TC88 design-standards committee, and we take work packages inside European research consortia. The commercial work and the research are the same work, sold twice.

We say what is not built yet

Where something is a research track rather than a product, the site says so. You should be able to tell from the outside what we can hand over next month and what we cannot.

Georgios (Yorgos) Deskos

Our Approach

Same physics, both ends of an asset's life

Transparent, auditable, defensible

Research first, product second

We say what is not built yet

What we take on.

Writing.

Start a conversation.

Let's work together